Letters to Belmont Uplands Advisory Group And Local Legislators
in relation to Belmont Uplands 40 B Comprehensive Permit Application
(this page created February 3, 2006)
Please use the letters below as models for sending letters to these people,
listed in order of importance of where to send:
- Belmont Uplands Advisory Group
(see model text below and same text as a Microsoft Word document)
- Rep. Ann Paulsen
(see model text below and same text as a Microsoft Word document)
- Stephen Burrington
Department of Conservation and Recreation
251 Causeway St.
Boston, MA. 02114
FAR will be responding to the 40 B filing but you will need to write letters if you want environmental issues to be taken seriously, most importantly to the above three, and also to the following agencies.
Belmont Citizens Forum
Attention Sue Bass
P.O. Box 609
Belmont, MA 02478
Belmont Land Trust
Mike Baram
29 Ernest Rd.
Belmont, MA. 02478
Arlington Land Trust
Brian Rehrig
P.O. Box 492
Arlington, MA. 02476
Belmont Mass Audubon
Attention Roger Wrubel
10 Juniper Road
Belmont, MA. 02478
Sustainable Arlington
Arlington Town Hall
730 Mass Ave.
Arlington, MA. 02476
Sustainable Belmont (Vision 21)
Jan Kruse
Heather Tuttle
Belmont Town Hall
455 Concord Ave.
Belmont, MA. 02478
Zoning Board of Appeals
Bill Chin - Chair
Contact: Jay Szklut, Planning and Economic Development Manager
Office hours: 8 am - 4 pm, Monday thru Friday, by appointment
Location: Office of Community Development
Homer Municipal Building, Second Floor
19 Moore Street
Belmont, MA 02478
Phone: 617-993-2666
Fax: 617-993-2651
E-mail: jszklut@town.belmont.ma.us
Background information:
- Did you know that the Silver Maple Forest is likely to be clear cut
in the next year if the developer has his way?
- Did you know that many tons of climate carbon sequestration relief,
and flood plain protecting trees (hundreds) will be felled?
- Did you know that the "Uplands" is technically a "small river flood
plain forest"?
- Did you know that the "uplands" is really a rare silver maple forest
and it is unique in the Boston area, that holds the entire Alewife
urban wild (Alewife Reservation) together for 19 species of mammals
and 90 species of birds?
- Did you know that the towns of Belmont and Arlington have both voted
against the development of the Uplands on June 28, 2004?
- Did you know that the town of Belmont cannot vote on whether to
approve or not, the granted 40 B Housing application - a Massachusetts mandate in conjunction with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development?
- Did you know that the removal of most of the Uplands (all upland
area around the flood plain and vegetated buffering wetlands), will
scatter or kill much very rare urban nesting and hibernating
wildlife? Fisher, otter, fox, coyote, rabbit, muskrats, mink, etc.
- Did you know that O'Neill's 40 B filing estimates up to 1000
people, or 299 units, in the middle of stagnant mosquito marshes,
wetlands and sensitive ecology systems with no amenities unless they
are added to the already inappropriate plan?
- Did you know that Little River and Little Pond in Belmont and
Cambridge already have dangerously high levels of bacteria and
pathogens tested by Mystic River Watershed Association?
- Did you know that there is already a flooding issue along the flood
plain and river where the developer will discharge into?
- Did you know that Cambridge and state have extensive cleanup
measures proposed, and are far along in their planned clean up of a
part of Little River and Alewife Brook by 85 percent?
- Did you know that the Mass Historical Society was against building
on the Uplands because it believes that archeological relics may
still be present?
- Did you know that because of the great fill 60 years ago, that much of the Uplands has rich deposits and an undersoil that is excellent for borrowing and hibernating, but unstable for a huge building, such as the "40B" one proposed for nearly 1000 persons.
For more information, please see:
Model letters:
To: Belmont Uplands Advisory Group C/O Belmont Selectmen
455 Concord Ave.
Belmont, MA 02478
Attention: Fred Paulsen: Chair
We (I) at______________ in ___________________ ask you to consider the Uplands matter again in a broader environmental context. I (we) are aware of the dangerous precedent this development on top of a full grown forest may set elsewhere on the watershed. While others are not without blame for many decisions that have harmed the Mystic waterways, we want to change and begin a more thorough protectionist campaign with ________ and our sister town of Belmont on this.
Belmont should meet its growth and revenue goals by encouraging redevelopment of previously developed sites that would reduce runoff and improve water quality. Mystic River Watershed Association (MyRWA) recommended that Belmont require higher environmental mitigation standards. Given what we now know about the area's water quality and flooding problems, thanks to MyRWA testing, it is inexcusable to require that a new development on valuable forested open space and wildlife habitat only meet the minimal development standards.
Flooding in the Alewife sub-watershed appears to be worsening. A likely major contributor is a dramatic reduction in open space in the area. MyRWA has argued that once the natural site is developed, it would be virtually impossible to replicate previous hydrologic site conditions.
There are many possible water quantity and quality impacts with the proposed development. The area is already prone to flooding and carries high bacterial loads.
We are especially concerned about the 19 species of mammal and 90 bird species that have been assessed there. This "small river-flood plain forest", named by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, is a natural community and should be understood as such. There are protections for "Natural Communities" (Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Department) and this rare forest should be studied for its flood plain tree value and for its habitat and the role that it plays in protecting our river, streams and ponds.
Yours truly,
Rep. Ann Paulsen
Massachusetts State House
Boston, MA 02133
Dear Rep. Ann Paulsen,
Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney consistently speaks in behalf of "smart growth" in clear statements in the Boston Globe and in other forums against "urban sprawl". He says we must build on re- developed land. The "small river flood plain forest" of 15 acres, named by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, is in Belmont, but holds the Alewife Reservation together in its most isolated area bringing wetland to upland, a topographical feature that makes the uplands unique, with its rare silver maple stand. It is the core of the urban wild which knows no boundaries. This stand is a true gateway to the west from Boston on a major transportation artery. It is soon slated for development, therefore much will be clear-cut. The forest is nearly a mile from the Alewife T stop and there is no other transportation or amenities, which would have to be built on this fragile ecosystem.
If sprawl is to be stopped, future development must be on land that is publicly accessible by good transportation, and can be redeveloped, not on top of land and waterways that are performing a valuable natural resource flood plain function of the region.
We have the opportunity to influence all municipalities including Belmont, and to share solutions for protecting the forested Uplands and their connecting ecosystems of marshes, ponds, a river, streams and great amounts of rare habitat.
These discussions must include solutions which run the gamut from Conservation Restriction, tax transfers, land swaps, or municipal sharing of purchase, etc. The Belmont Uplands Advisory group appointed by the Selectmen, and Trust for Public Land can help find the best solution for the owner-developer, Brian O'Neill, but especially the state's Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), which owns most of the abutting land and wetlands. These public lands will be heavily impacted with any development, whether housing or commercial.
Cambridge also has municipal responsibility for over 100 acres of the DCR lands and has 3 acres on the O'Neill property. Cambridge's improvement plans would be insured and expanded if the Uplands were to be a part of the Alewife Reservation, thus insuring it as a great protected urban wild, recreational area, and access for the general region, as is already planned in the extraordinary 2004 DCR master plan.
Yours truly,
We Speak for the Trees - For They Cannot Speak for Themselves:
(Forest Service Contribution to Global Warming Service Sunday, January 29, 2006, First Parish Unitarian in Cambridge)
That was the Lorax message tied around the forest trees with colored ribbon by our children of First Parish one beautiful snowy solstice time. That day, we surrounded many large silver maples in the rare woodland at Alewife, the oldest birding area in the United States. World renowned ornithologist, William Brewster began birding here as a boy in what was then the region's Great Swamp. When I visit this rare hardwood stand, full of ducks, otter fox and coyote, I sense with my whole being that I'm part of the natural world, now, I'm sad by the planned destruction of the forest a rarity in the Boston area.
From the wonderful world of environmental saints, I learn how we humans are interconnected with other species of mammal and bird. I am the creature searching for nurture, conserving my energy and strength. I'm the rabbit, taking care of my own, avoiding predators or too many challenges. I vibrate with life with coming of spring. I'm the fox, putting all extra movement aside to raise my young. Even plants teach about chlorophyll, minerals and filtering pollutants, just as the human body must do. Our common genetics boggle the mind.
As human stewards of the earth, it is inconceivable that our forest and its inhabitants will be taken from our lives and our neighbors lives--so many other places for people to live. We'll soon lose a sacred sanctuary.
Our children have asked that the trees remain. Our towns and cities need their wetlands and flood plain trees. We are right to protect our wild places ---to say no to environmental disasters in our back yards.
We must write letters to our elected officials and those who are able to intervene to give our natural world a voice as it cannot speak for itself. Please come to sign a letter or to write your own.
|